Monday, October 12, 2026 Latest Russell Brand Stands Trial in London on Rape and Sexual Assault Charges Our standards
Science

Twin Study Reveals Genetics Influence Human Enjoyment of Music

A new twin study published in Nature Communications reveals that human enjoyment of music is partly heritable, with DNA differences accounting for 54% of the variation in musical…

Twin Study Reveals Genetics Influence Human Enjoyment of Music
Twin Study Reveals Genetics Influence Human Enjoyment of Music

A new twin study published in Nature Communications reveals that human enjoyment of music is partly heritable, with DNA differences accounting for 54% of the variation in musical reward sensitivity within a Swedish sample, shedding light on a trait that puzzled Charles Darwin.

Music weaves through the core of human emotion, culture, and social connection. As reported by Science Daily, music plays a significant role in human emotions, social bonding, and cultural expression. Yet why certain people find deep pleasure in melodies while others remain indifferent has long remained an open question. Researchers have now turned to genetics to understand why musical experiences move people so differently.

Genetic Influences on Musical Reward Sensitivity in Twin Research

By comparing similarities between identical twins—who share identical DNA—and fraternal twins, researchers can measure the extent to which genetics influence a specific trait.

Participants self-reported their enjoyment of music, general reward sensitivity, and perceptual abilities regarding musical characteristics such as pitch, melody, and rhythm.

Twin Study Reveals Genetics Influence Human Enjoyment of Music
Photo: Alarabiya

The findings indicate that the capacity to feel pleasure from music is partially heritable. Researchers estimated that DNA differences account for 54% of the variation in musical enjoyment within the studied Swedish cohort.

Independent Genetic Pathways Behind Musical Pleasure

The investigation went beyond general heritability to examine whether musical reward relies on the same biological mechanisms as other pleasurable experiences. Investigators discovered that the genetic influences tied to musical reward sensitivity operate independently from general reward sensitivity and basic musical aptitude, and that genetic factors influencing musical enjoyment differ partially from the genes driving general reward or musical ability.

Distinct genetic pathways appear to shape different dimensions of musical interaction, ranging from emotional regulation and dancing to rhythm to playing instruments alongside others. Lead researcher Giacomo Bignardi emphasized how these patterns affect human psychology.

“The answer to this big question might open a window to understanding deeper and broader aspects of the human mind, such as how experiences turn into sources of pleasure.”

Giacomo Bignardi, Lead Researcher

Bignardi added that the team aimed to determine whether individual genetic variations lead to differences in the pleasure people derive from music, and what those differences reveal about human musicality as a whole.

Complex Interplay Between Genes and Environment

While DNA plays a substantial role, researchers caution against viewing musical taste as purely hardwired.

“The results show that our enjoyment of music does not depend exclusively on our ability to perceive musical tones or feel joy in general. Rather, it seems that there are specific genetic and environmental factors that affect our musical sensitivity.”

Miriam Mosing, Researcher

Future studies aim to pinpoint specific regions of the genome that contribute most significantly to human musical enjoyment, continuing scientific exploration into a trait that continues to intrigue researchers.

Accuracy matters. See something that needs attention? Read our corrections policy or contact the newsroom.

Science Editor

Iris Okafor

Iris Okafor is the editorial identity for TellingPointy's Science desk, following research, space, climate, energy, and discovery with evidence at the centre. Okafor's desk examines study design, sample size, uncertainty, replication, and the difference between a preprint, a peer-reviewed result, and a settled scientific view. The aim is not to drain discovery of wonder, but to show readers exactly what is known, how it is known, and what remains open.