Sunday, October 11, 2026 Latest No. 1 Nebraska Volleyball Sweeps No. 7 Wisconsin in Straight Sets Our standards
Science

USGS Scientists Find Deep-Sea Rocks Can Spontaneously Combust in Laboratory

Researchers at the United States Geological Survey discovered that two metal-sulfide rock samples collected from the Pacific Ocean’s Escanaba Trough in 2022 spontaneously…

USGS Scientists Find Deep-Sea Rocks Can Spontaneously Combust in Laboratory
USGS Scientists Find Deep-Sea Rocks Can Spontaneously Combust in Laboratory

Researchers at the United States Geological Survey discovered that two metal-sulfide rock samples collected from the Pacific Ocean’s Escanaba Trough in 2022 spontaneously combusted after being freeze-dried and crushed during laboratory analysis. The incident, which caused temperatures to exceed 100 °C, highlights potential safety risks for future deep-sea mining operations if mineral deposits are brought to the surface.

Spontaneous Combustion in the Escanaba Trough Samples

The incident occurred as scientists processed 57 hydrothermal rock samples retrieved from four regions within the Escanaba Trough, located in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone off the Oregon–California border. While examining the mineralogy of these deep-sea deposits—which are typically rich in copper, zinc, and iron—researchers observed an unexpected reaction. When two specific samples were freeze-dried and crushed in the laboratory, they spontaneously combusted.

The resulting chemical reaction was intense, leading to complete oxidation of the original material and generating temperatures surpassing 100 °C. Investigators determined that the combustible rocks were composed primarily of nanocrystalline marcasite, a form of iron sulfide that displays significant instability when exposed to oxygen. The energy required to initiate this oxidation process was provided by mechanochemical forces, such as the crushing and grinding performed during standard laboratory preparation.

Safety Implications for Deep-Sea Mining

The discovery has prompted warnings from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) regarding the hazards of extracting seafloor massive sulfide deposits. Because mining would involve bringing these materials from high-pressure, low-oxygen deep-sea environments to the surface, the minerals would be subjected to rapid shifts in moisture, pressure, and temperature. These changes could trigger exothermic reactions, potentially posing a fire risk for transport vessels.

The USGS noted that this is a potential hazard that could merit special consideration if deep-sea mining of seafloor massive sulfide deposits moves forward. While the research does not imply that every marcasite-bearing rock on the ocean floor is inherently dangerous, it suggests that the physical and chemical properties of these deep-sea minerals may differ substantially from land-based deposits.

Regulators Draft Mining Safety Rules for Mineral Deposits

The findings arrive as the International Seabed Authority (ISA) moves forward with exploration contracts for sulfide minerals on the Northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the Southwest Indian Ridge. Although commercial mining has not yet commenced, the USGS emphasizes that safety regulations for the industry must account for these chemical instabilities.

Researchers compared the chemical composition and thermal behavior of the collected samples to rule out other factors, such as the presence of petroleum or tar, which are sometimes found in sediment-heavy deep ocean regions. Instead, they concluded that the instability of the nanocrystalline marcasite itself is the primary driver of the self-heating phenomenon. As the industry advances, the ability of these rocks to undergo rapid oxidation remains a critical factor for engineers to address to prevent accidents during the handling and transport of deep-sea materials.

Accuracy matters. See something that needs attention? Read our corrections policy or contact the newsroom.

Science Editor

Iris Okafor

Iris Okafor is the editorial identity for TellingPointy's Science desk, following research, space, climate, energy, and discovery with evidence at the centre. Okafor's desk examines study design, sample size, uncertainty, replication, and the difference between a preprint, a peer-reviewed result, and a settled scientific view. The aim is not to drain discovery of wonder, but to show readers exactly what is known, how it is known, and what remains open.