As Lisa Thomas monitored Worcester’s early voting site at the city’s downtown public library, she noticed something different about this year’s election: voters are spending noticeably more time at the booths, wrestling with a three-page ballot featuring a record-tying nine questions, as GBH News reported.
The Weight of the Ballot
For weeks, election administrators have watched as citizens grapple with complex statewide measures alongside marquee races for governor and U.S. senator. Thomas, who has overseen elections for years in Worcester and previously in Marlborough, points out the root cause of the slowdown.
“For some folks, it can be a little confusing because there are nine ballot questions,” said Thomas. “It’s a little overwhelming. When you come in, you’re welcome to sit down or stand up at any of our voting booths and take your time going through everything.”
The statewide measures address a diverse and high-stakes array of policies. Voters are weighing the future of marijuana legalization, gun restrictions, potential modifications to public records law, and changes to single family home zoning. With polls showing Democratic incumbents holding commanding leads over Republican challengers in major races, some voters say the ballot questions are the most intriguing aspect of the midterms in Massachusetts.
Voters Take Longer to Complete Unfamiliar Ballots
Organizations have spent more than $20 million campaigning for or against the questions. Media outlets and social media personalities have released ample breakdowns explaining what they would do. Despite these efforts, Thomas reports that voters are spending at least five minutes on average filling out their ballots—a marked increase from past elections—with multiple people arriving entirely unfamiliar with the ballot questions.

To combat the confusion, local and state officials are urging participants to study the questions beforehand. Polling locations are actively distributing the state’s informational red books, which feature official summaries followed by brief explanations of what a “yes” or “no” vote would accomplish. While some early voters found the summaries confusing, they acknowledged that the short explanations provided necessary clarity.
Voters like Jennifer Cupp, who studied the questions in advance, recommend that others do the same. Because citizens get to exercise their right to vote only so often, Cupp argues, they might as well be prepared and knowledgeable.
“Do some research ahead of time,” she said. “Try and go in informed.”
Strategies in the Booth
Different households have adopted varied tactics to tackle the paperwork. Debi Mangiameli consulted her husband, who cast his ballot a few days earlier. Kenneth Day took a more structured approach, drafting a personal cheat sheet to bring into the voting booth.
Creating a reference guide at home makes the process significantly faster, Day explained, adding that voters will feel pressured if they encounter the ballot questions for the first time in the voting booth.
Looking ahead to potential structural shifts, Question 3 would change the competitive dynamics of Massachusetts elections, though those specific changes would not take effect until 2028 and would not apply to presidential campaigns or municipal elections.
For now, election workers keep handing out red books, and voters keep arriving with handwritten cheat sheets, trying to make sense of a ballot that demands homework before a single oval is filled.