Friday, October 9, 2026 Latest Eric Deters Claims Guilfoyle Asked Him to Pay $100,000 Amex Bill Our standards
Technology

Trump Pushes Super Intelligence Terminology and Labels Critics Enemies

President Donald Trump renewed his push to replace the term artificial intelligence with super intelligence, stating on social media that the White House considers individuals who…

Trump Pushes Super Intelligence Terminology and Labels Critics Enemies
Trump Pushes Super Intelligence Terminology and Labels Critics Enemies

President Donald Trump renewed his push to replace the term artificial intelligence with super intelligence, stating on social media that the White House considers individuals who continue using the older phrasing to be enemies, following an executive order targeting government agencies.

The administration’s insistence on a linguistic shift escalated sharply when the president took to his platform to declare anyone using the conventional technology term an adversary. While the White House has drawn a hard line on vocabulary, the administration has not specified what regulatory actions or penalties might follow for individuals or institutions that keep using the established industry phrase.

Trump Calls Anyone Who Says ‘AI’ Instead Of ‘Super Intelligence’ An ‘Enemy’

Federal Order Prompts Tech Companies to Adopt New Terminology

The push for new terminology moved from rhetoric to federal policy in late September when the president signed an executive order requiring American government institutions to adopt the super intelligence designation in all references to these technologies. Although the directive applies strictly to federal operations rather than the private sector, major technology figures and companies have already begun shifting their vocabulary. Meta, led by Mark Zuckerberg, and billionaire Elon Musk have both utilized the new term in public posts across social media platforms.

The White House considers anyone who uses the term artificial intelligence instead of the new, more acceptable and accurate term, super intelligence, an enemy.

Trump Pushes Super Intelligence Terminology and Labels Critics Enemies
Photo: aljazeera.net

The Rhetoric Behind the Push at the United Nations

The vocabulary debate first emerged on the international stage last month. During his address before the United Nations General Assembly, the president urged the international community to adopt the super intelligence label, arguing that the phrasing simply sounds much better than traditional terminology.

According to media coverage, the rationale behind the preference rests on the idea that the word artificial makes the intelligence sound fake. The administration contends that the technology is astonishing rather than counterfeit, even as officials maintain that the sector requires careful oversight.

Technical Definitions Versus Political Terminology

The administration’s preferred phrasing conflicts directly with established computer science definitions. Educational platforms like Coursera note that super intelligence describes a theoretical form of artificial intelligence that does not currently exist. In technical contexts, the term refers specifically to hypothetical systems that exceed human capabilities across a broad spectrum of cognitive tasks, rather than everyday software applications.

Observers suggest the naming push carries clear political and media dimensions as the administration attempts to project a positive image of the industry. That messaging arrives alongside mounting public anxieties over system security and sharp criticism aimed at the expansion of data centers across the United States.

Accuracy matters. See something that needs attention? Read our corrections policy or contact the newsroom.

Technology Editor

Maya Serrano

Maya Serrano is the editorial identity for TellingPointy's Technology desk, covering artificial intelligence, platforms, software, hardware, cybersecurity, and digital policy. Serrano's work translates complex systems without sanding away the important details. Her desk asks who controls a technology, what data and incentives power it, where the real limits sit, and how a product or policy changes the balance among users, companies, governments, and the wider public.